Analyze claim strength across validity, detectability, design-around resistance, and claim construction. Built on MPEP standards and Federal Circuit case law.
Every claim is scored across multiple dimensions with references to specific MPEP sections and controlling case law.
Evaluate 101 eligibility under Alice/Mayo, 112(b) definiteness issues, and means-plus-function scope limitations per MPEP 2106 and 2181.
Assess infringement detection difficulty. Identifies divided infringement risks (Akamai) and claim types that complicate enforcement.
Score claim breadth based on transition phrases (MPEP 2111.03), functional language, and element count.
Identify terms likely to cause construction disputes. Flags indefinite terms, Jepson claims, and ambiguous transitions.
Optional scoring for prior art proximity. Detects anticipation, near-anticipation, and obviousness under MPEP 2141 (Graham factors).
Each claim receives a composite score weighted across four core dimensions, with optional business and prior art factors.
Analysis grounded in Manual of Patent Examining Procedure and Federal Circuit precedent.
If your analysis reveals weak scores or complex issues, it may be time to consult a patent professional. We maintain a list of recommended patent law firms experienced in claim drafting and prosecution.
View Recommended Firms →Paste your claims or upload a file. Get instant multi-dimensional scoring with legal citations.
Launch Claim Analyzer →